<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.machinedesign.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>from the editor's desk</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.1)</generator><item><title>The real climate threat: global cooling</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/09/02/the-real-climate-threat-global-cooling.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:30027</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/30027.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=30027</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interesting piece in Daily Tech about the lack of sunspot activity. The last time this happened, the earth experienced a mini ice age. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.dailytech.com/Sun+Makes+History+First+Spotless+Month+in+a+Century/article12823.htm"&gt;http://www.dailytech.com/Sun+Makes+History+First+Spotless+Month+in+a+Century/article12823.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30027" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/global+warming/default.aspx">global warming</category></item><item><title>more on ethanol -- small suppliers are toast</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/08/21/more-on-ethanol-small-suppliers-are-toast.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:30001</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/30001.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=30001</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Futures Magazine reports that a significant number of smaller ethanol plants have recently filed for bankruptcy or been scrapped before completion, thanks to rising corn and energy prices. Apparantly part of the problem is that farmers contracted to feedstock can't really do it:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://futuresmag.com/cms/Futures/Monthly%20Issues/Issues/2008/08/Editorial/Departments/Trendlines/Trendlines-Ethanol?searchfor=shake-out%20in%20ethanol"&gt;http://futuresmag.com/cms/Futures/Monthly%20Issues/Issues/2008/08/Editorial/Departments/Trendlines/Trendlines-Ethanol?searchfor=shake-out%20in%20ethanol&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=30001" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/ethanol/default.aspx">ethanol</category></item><item><title>Something to look forward to? China likely surpasses U.S. in manufacturing next year</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/08/13/something-to-look-forward-to-china-likely-surpasses-u-s-in-manufacturing-next-year.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29978</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29978.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29978</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;H1 class=storytitle id=StoryContent_TopPageNavigation_Headline&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/H1&gt;
&lt;DIV class=StoryHeadlineDetails id=synccommentslinkheader style="DISPLAY:none;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="CLEAR:both;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id=HeaderSepDiv&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id=StoryContent_ContentRail&gt;
&lt;DIV class=StoryPrint&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p id=widgetInsert&gt;&lt;B&gt;&amp;nbsp;Well, it was bound to happen sometime the way things are going. Now it looks as though it will happen next year, according to this story from MarketWatch.com. Here is a link to the full story:&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/china-top-us-manufacturing-2009/story.aspx?guid={46448549-CE99-4D28-8325-9CB13812C55C"&gt;http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/china-top-us-manufacturing-2009/story.aspx?guid={46448549-CE99-4D28-8325-9CB13812C55C&lt;/A&gt;}&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;China set to surpass U.S. as top manufacturer&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;&lt;B&gt;NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- China is forecast to surpass the United States as the world's leading manufacturer in nominal dollar terms next year, earlier than expected, as the U.S. economy slows down and China's continues to grow at unprecedented rates, according to consulting firm Global Insight.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;The nominal value of U.S. manufacturing weakened somewhat sharply in 2007, and despite the outlook for modest recovery in the coming years, China will likely gain the largest share in global manufacturing as early as 2009, Global Insight said in a report released Tuesday. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;"The basic reason [for China closing the gap] is that growth in the U.S. economy has essentially been zero over the last year and will continue to struggle over the next year," said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at Global Insight. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;TABLE class="" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=9 align=left&gt;

&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class="" align=left&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;"We know that China is a big manufacturing giant now," Behravesh said in an interview with MarketWatch. "What this study suggests is that it will continue to play an increasingly larger role" in the world economy. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;Measured in real value-added terms, China's share in global manufacturing is forecast to overtake that of the U.S. by 2016-2017, boosted by rapid gains in market share of textiles, basic metals, computer equipment and mineral product manufacturing, according to Global Insight. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;However, the U.S. will continue to lead in certain high-value industries, such as aerospace, pharmaceuticals and specialized equipment. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=p&gt;The manufacturing sector accounts for only 12.5% of gross domestic product in the U.S., while it makes up 36% of the Chinese economy. Manufacturing as a share of the U.S. economy has been declining for decades, with the service sector enjoying a much more dominant role. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29978" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/manufacturing/default.aspx">manufacturing</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/China/default.aspx">China</category></item><item><title>top US export: Waste paper</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/08/11/top-us-export-waste-paper.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29957</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29957.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29957</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoPlainText style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;FONT face=Consolas size=3&gt;Manufacturing &amp;amp; Technology News ran an interesting item recently. They collected information about the top US imports and exports. It turns out our number-one export by volume is waste paper. Of course, this is nothing new. Waste paper has been our top export for some time. Also interesting is their list of top importers. You can find the whole article here: &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoPlainText style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/08/0731/PIERS.html"&gt;http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/08/0731/PIERS.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoPlainText style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoPlainText style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;And here are the two lists:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Top 50 U.S. Importers Via Ocean Container Transport -- 2007&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As measured in 20-foot-equivalent container units or TEUs 
&lt;P&gt;The first number listed for each company is the number of TEUs imported in 2007, followed by 2004 and 2002. NR means the company was not on the top 100 list for that year. SOURCE: Journal of Commerce and the Port Import/Export Reporting Service (PIERS). 
&lt;P&gt;1. Wal-Mart Stores, retail, 720,000, 576,000, 291,900 &lt;BR&gt;2. Target Corp., retail, 435,000 202,700, 173,100 &lt;BR&gt;3. The Home Depot, retail, 365,300, 301,200, 182,000 &lt;BR&gt;4. Sears (includes K-Mart), retail, 248,600, 186,000, 60,400 &lt;BR&gt;5. Dole Food, food, 223,200, 164,100, 142,900 &lt;BR&gt;6. Costco Wholesale, retail, 183,800, 66,400, 19,382 &lt;BR&gt;7. Lowes Cos., retail, 182,100, 100,000, 82,900 &lt;BR&gt;8. LG Group, conglomerate, 130,000, 43,300, 33,500 &lt;BR&gt;9. Philips Electronics, electronics, 127,200, 27,200, 22,000 &lt;BR&gt;10. Chiquita Brands Intl., food, 116,300, 115,600, 103,200 &lt;BR&gt;11. General Electric, conglomerate, 112,900, 51,800, 48,500 &lt;BR&gt;12. Ashley Furniture Inds., furniture, 104,700, 69,800, 45,200 &lt;BR&gt;13. Heineken USA, beverages, 104,300, 83,400, 75,000 &lt;BR&gt;14. Ikea Intl., retail, 102,000, 100,000, 44,700 &lt;BR&gt;15. Jarden Corp., appliances, 74,700, 21,800, 14,600 &lt;BR&gt;16. Red Bull, beverages, 72,500, 20,400, NR &lt;BR&gt;17. JC Penny Corp. 68,400, 45,000, NR &lt;BR&gt;18. Whirlpool, appliances, 67,300, 26,800, NR &lt;BR&gt;19. Canon, computers, 66,400, 26,200, 220,000 &lt;BR&gt;20. Nike, footwear &amp;amp; apparel, 62,700, 47,900, 38,700 &lt;BR&gt;21. Williams Sonoma, retail, 62,400, 50,000, 19,200 &lt;BR&gt;22. Gap Stores, retail, 59,300, 14,800, 12,000 &lt;BR&gt;23. Toyota Tsusho America, autos, 58,800, 52,000, 45,000 &lt;BR&gt;24. Bridgestone Americas, tires, 52,300, 42,500, 26,800 &lt;BR&gt;25. Dollar General, retail, 51,000, 40,000, NR &lt;BR&gt;26. Samsung, electronics, 50,800, 52,800, 46,200 &lt;BR&gt;27. Pier 1 Imports, retail, 49,600, 48,100, 46,700 &lt;BR&gt;28. Mattel, toys, 48,900, 49,300, 43,700 &lt;BR&gt;29. Sony Corp., conglomerate, 46,900, 47,100, 40,000 &lt;BR&gt;30. Big Lots, liquidator-retail, 46,600, 36,300, 45,800 &lt;BR&gt;31. Daimler AG, autos, 46,500, 14,600, 14,200 &lt;BR&gt;32. Family Dollar Stores, retail, 44,600, 19,300, 10,000 &lt;BR&gt;33. Panasonic Corp., electronics, 43,300, 52,100, 41,500 &lt;BR&gt;34. Furniture Brands Intl., furniture, 42,700, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;35. Kohl's Corp., retail, 42,400, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;36. Nestle, food &amp;amp; beverages, 40,400, 28,500, 14,300 &lt;BR&gt;37. Dorel Industries, furniture, 39,900, 28,700, NR &lt;BR&gt;38. Michelin, tires &amp;amp; rubber, 38,700, 46,100, 34,500 &lt;BR&gt;39. Staples, retail, 32,800, 13,200, NR &lt;BR&gt;40. Yamaha, transportation mfg., 32,000, 27,300, 24,600 &lt;BR&gt;41. Del Monte Foods, food, 32,000, 32,400, 12,600 &lt;BR&gt;42. Nissan North America, autos, 31,800, 27,700, 16,500 &lt;BR&gt;43. American Honda, autos, 30,900, 10,300, 46,200 &lt;BR&gt;44. Michaels Stores, retail, 30,600, 27,100, 14,600 &lt;BR&gt;45. Hewlett-Packard, computers, 29,700, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;46. Coaster of America, furniture, 29,500, 13,300, NR &lt;BR&gt;47. Hankook Tire Americas, tires, 28,800, 20,400, NR &lt;BR&gt;48. CVS Corp., retail, 28,000, 10,200, 16,000 &lt;BR&gt;49. BMW, autos, 27,400, 14,200, 14,000 &lt;BR&gt;50. Rooms to Go, retail, 27,200, 24,200, 19,800 
&lt;HR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Top 100 U.S. Exporters Via Ocean Container Transport -- 2007&lt;/B&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;As measured in 20-foot-equivalent container units or TEUs The first number is the number of TEUs exported in 2007, followed by TEUs exported in 2004 and 2002. NR means the company was not on the list of top 100 for that year. SOURCE: Journal of Commerce and the Port Import/Export Reporting Service. 
&lt;P&gt;1. American Chung Nam, wastepaper, 211,300, 201,100, 156,500 &lt;BR&gt;2. Weyerhaeuser, forest products/paper, 165,800, 154,900 95,600 &lt;BR&gt;3. Cargill, food, 123,800, 80,600 51,200 &lt;BR&gt;4. Koch Industries, paper, 123,400, 29,100, NR &lt;BR&gt;5. International Paper, paper, 100,900, 42,700, 50,100 &lt;BR&gt;6. Dow Chemical, chemicals, 100,000, 64,700, 52,400 &lt;BR&gt;7. DuPont, chemicals, 93,100, 123,000, 104,000 &lt;BR&gt;8. MeadWestvaco, paper, 77,900, 66,800, 59,000 &lt;BR&gt;9. P&amp;amp;G, consumer products, 73,800, 54,200,48,000 &lt;BR&gt;10. Archer Daniels Midland, food, 73,300, 32,300, 17,700 &lt;BR&gt;11. Potential Industries, wastepaper, 70,800, 22,300, 11,500 &lt;BR&gt;12. Newport CH Intl., paper, steel recyclables, 69,700, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;13. Sims Metal Mgmt., metals, recyclables, 69,600, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;14. Cedarwood-Young, wastepaper, 64,900, 38,600, 21,000 &lt;BR&gt;15. CGB Enterprises, agriculture, 57,500, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;16. ExxonMobil Chemical, chemicals, 56,500, 44,300, 28,700 &lt;BR&gt;17. Cellmark Group, paper, 54,200, 56,700, 45,100 &lt;BR&gt;18. JC Horizon, waste paper, 53,000, 28,700, 25,400 &lt;BR&gt;19. BASF, chemicals, 52,500, 50,200, 38,500 &lt;BR&gt;20. Mega Fiber, waste paper, 44,300, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;21. Denison Intl., recycled paper, 43,400, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;22. DaimlerAG, autos, 41,700, 50,100, 47,000 &lt;BR&gt;23. General Electric, conglomerate, 41,200, 50,000, 44,400 &lt;BR&gt;24. Toyota Tsusho, autos/parts, 40,900, 28,100, 13,100 &lt;BR&gt;25. Allenberg Cotton, cotton, 39,800, 45,900, 21,200 &lt;BR&gt;26. AbitibiBowater, paper, 39,000, 18,900, 9,300 &lt;BR&gt;27. Caterpillar, machinery, 37,300,. 23,500, 19,200 &lt;BR&gt;28. Wal-Mart Stores, retail, 36,400, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;29. Rayonier, paper &amp;amp; forest products, 35,500, 31,700, 26,900 &lt;BR&gt;30. Mitsui, conglomerate, 34,900, 24,300, 24,300 &lt;BR&gt;31. Eastman Chemical, chemicals, 34,800, 37,900, 21,500 &lt;BR&gt;32. Staple Cotton Coop. Assn., 33,200, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;33. Schoular Co., foodstuffs, 33,100, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;34. Shintech, chemicals, 32,900, 22,300, 29,500 &lt;BR&gt;35. Yao Yang Enterprises, wastepaper, 32,700, 29,400, 20,600 &lt;BR&gt;36. Sino Paper, recycled paper, 32,300, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;37. Tyson Foods, food, 31,300, 19,600, 44,100 &lt;BR&gt;38. Itochu Specialty Chemicals, chemicals, 30,900, 26,700, NR &lt;BR&gt;39. Rio Tinto America, minerals, 28,900, 18,500, NR &lt;BR&gt;40. Kimberly Clark, consumer goods, 28,400, 23,900, NR &lt;BR&gt;40. Delong, animal feed, 28,400, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;40. International Forest Products, paper, 28,400, 20,000, NR &lt;BR&gt;43. 3M, chemicals, 28,300, 16,800, 14,500 &lt;BR&gt;44. Goodyear Tire &amp;amp; Rubber, tires, 27,300, 21,600, 19,000 &lt;BR&gt;44. Dunavant Enterprises, cotton, 27,300, 32,600, 22,700 &lt;BR&gt;46. Paul Reinhart, cotton, 27,000, NR, NR &lt;BR&gt;47. Ford Motor, autos, 26,800, 30,200, 32,300 &lt;BR&gt;47. Mills Brothers Intl., food/grain, 26,800, 17,900, NR &lt;BR&gt;49. Fruit of the Loom, textiles, 26,300, 16,900, NR &lt;BR&gt;50. ConAgra Foods, food, 25,900, 27,400, 42,200 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29957" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/import+policy/default.aspx">import policy</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/export+policy/default.aspx">export policy</category></item><item><title>If US science education is so bad, why are these guys so good?</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/08/01/so-us-science-education-is-so-bad-why-are-these-guys-so-good.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29918</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29918.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29918</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;H1 class=storytitle&gt;U.S. Physics Team 'Brings Home the Gold' (and a Silver) From International Competition&lt;/H1&gt;
&lt;TABLE class=border cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=5 class="border"&gt;

&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class=""&gt;&lt;B&gt;Libraries&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Medical News&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD class=""&gt;&lt;B&gt;Keywords&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;STUDENT, PHYSICS, OLYMPIC &lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class="" colSpan=3&gt;
&lt;P class=flat50&gt;&lt;B&gt;Contact Information&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;I&gt;Available for logged-in reporters only&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class="" colSpan=3&gt;
&lt;P class=flat50&gt;&lt;B&gt;Description&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;he 2008 U.S. Physics Team returns home triumphant this week, having earned four gold medals and a silver medal at the International Physics Olympiad held in Hanoi in Vietnam. &lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;TABLE class="" style="PADDING-LEFT:0px;PADDING-BOTTOM:0px;" cellSpacing=0 align=right&gt;

&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class=""&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class=""&gt;&lt;IMG height=5 src="http://www.newswise.com/images/tp.gif" width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class=""&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class=""&gt;&lt;IMG height=5 src="http://www.newswise.com/images/tp.gif" width=1 border=0&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class=""&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Newswise — The 2008 U.S. Physics Team returns home triumphant this week, having earned four gold medals and a silver medal at the International Physics Olympiad held in Hanoi in Vietnam. Only the Chinese mainland and Taiwan, who tied for first, ranked higher than the U.S. team, which placed second along with South Korea and India. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The U.S. Physics Team’s gold medalists are:&lt;BR&gt;Tucker Chan, Princeton High School, Princeton, NJ;&lt;BR&gt;Danny Zhu, Stuyvesant High School, New York, NY;&lt;BR&gt;Edward Gan, Montgomery Blair High School, Silver Spring, MD; &lt;BR&gt;Joshua Oreman, Harvard Westlake School, North Hollywood, CA; &lt;BR&gt;and its silver medalist is Rui Hu, The Charter School of Wilmington, DE. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Chan, Zhu, and Hu graduated from high school this past spring; Gan and Oreman have one more year to go.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The students were selected in June after a two-phase national contest and a ten-day training camp, conducted by coaches chosen by the American Association of Physics Teachers in College Park, MD.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Photos and student biographies are at &lt;A href="http://www.aapt.org/olympiad2008/team.cfm?Winners=1"&gt;http://www.aapt.org/olympiad2008/team.cfm?Winners=1&lt;/A&gt; There is an online blog of the students' adventures since April at &lt;A href="http://www.aapt.org/"&gt;http://www.aapt.org&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The international competition over, these students look toward a bright future. “Here is a side of America to celebrate,” said Charles Holbrow, executive officer of the American Association of Physics Teachers. “Congratulations to the US Physics Team and their coaches. We should all be proud of these talented young people. And with the rest of the world, we should admire the achievements of all the Physics Olympiad participants. The sheer intellectual pleasure that radiates with youthful energy from their work together is a delight to behold.”&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The five-member team was sponsored by the U.S. physics community. The contest and the students are supported with funds from ten professional societies: American Physical Society, The American Association of Physics Teachers, American Geophysical Union, The Society of Rheology, American Astronomical Society, American Acoustical Society, American Association of Physcists in Medicine, American Crystallographic Association, the AVS, and the Optical Society of America, which contributed one of the questions used on a selection exam. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;About the Olympiad&lt;BR&gt;The U.S. Physics Olympiad Program is a joint initiative of AAPT and AIP. AAPT began the program in 1986 to promote and demonstrate academic excellence. The International Olympiad is a nine-day competition among pre-university students from more than 80 nations. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;About AAPT&lt;BR&gt;AAPT is the leading organization for physics educators, with more than 11,000 members worldwide. The mission is to advance the greater good through physics education. It provides members with many opportunities for professional development, communication, and student enrichment. AAPT was founded in 1930 and is headquartered in the American Center for Physics in College Park, Maryland.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29918" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/science+educatino/default.aspx">science educatino</category></item><item><title>video: rocket-powered plane takes off</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/30/video-rocket-powered-plane-takes-off.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29911</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29911.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29911</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;This short video shot at the experimental aircraft get-together in Oshkosh gives you an idea of what the planes in the Rocket Racing League are going to look like and how they'll perform. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;http://tinyurl.com/6hlat7&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29911" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/rocket+racing+league/default.aspx">rocket racing league</category></item><item><title>video: the flying jet pack</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/30/video-the-flying-jet-pack.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29910</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29910.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29910</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Well, jet pack is a misnomer. This is actually powered by a piston engine which drives two ducted fans. It is a little like taking the ducted fan UAV that Honeywell came up with (you can see a video of that here: &lt;A href="http://machinedesign.com/Video/714/72766/HoneywellsHoveringUAV.aspx"&gt;http://machinedesign.com/Video/714/72766/HoneywellsHoveringUAV.aspx&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;and upsizing it&amp;nbsp;to fly a human. The demo was filmed at the recent experimental aircraft get-together at Oshkosh.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;http://tinyurl.com/66dmay&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29910" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/uav/default.aspx">uav</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/experimental+aircraft/default.aspx">experimental aircraft</category></item><item><title>news flash: girls are as good as boys when it comes to math</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/25/news-flash-girls-are-as-good-as-boys-when-it-comes-to-math.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29895</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29895.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29895</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;If women aren't going into technology and science career fields, it is not because they lack math apptitude. New research finds no difference between the average math scores of boys and girls in the grades 2 through 11. You can find a link to the study here, along with some interesting commentary on it at the Chronicle of Higher Education:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3191/girls-as-good-as-boys-at-math-study-finds?utm_source=at&amp;amp;utm_medium=en"&gt;http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3191/girls-as-good-as-boys-at-math-study-finds?utm_source=at&amp;amp;utm_medium=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29895" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/education/default.aspx">education</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/mathematics/default.aspx">mathematics</category></item><item><title>American Physical Society: many members don't believe in human-induced global warming</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/22/american-physical-society-many-members-don-t-believe-in-human-induced-global-warming.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29875</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29875.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29875</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Who says the issue of man-made global warming has been settled? The journal Physics &amp;amp; Society just published a debate on the subject because, according to the editor, &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO&lt;SUB&gt;2&lt;/SUB&gt; emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for the global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution. Since the correctness or fallacy of that conclusion has immense implications for public policy and for the future of the biosphere, we thought it appropriate to present a debate within the pages of P&amp;amp;S concerning that conclusion. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can see the rest of the editor's comments here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/editor.cfm"&gt;http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/editor.cfm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One of the conclusions found in the Journal paper called "Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered" is particularly interesting:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In short, we must get the science right, or we shall get the policy wrong. If the concluding equation in this analysis (Eqn. 30) is correct, the IPCC’s estimates of climate sensitivity must have been very much exaggerated. There may, therefore, be a good reason why, contrary to the projections of the models on which the IPCC relies, temperatures have not risen for a decade and have been falling since the phase-transition in global temperature trends that occurred in late 2001. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That paper can be found here: &lt;A href="http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm"&gt;http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Another interesting tidbit from the article: In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years ... Mars, Jupiter, Neptune ’s largest moon, and Pluto all warmed at the same time as Earth.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29875" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/global+warming/default.aspx">global warming</category></item><item><title>How to cheat on exams, courtesy of youtube</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/14/how-to-cheat-on-exams-courtesy-of-youtube.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29850</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29850.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29850</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;What ever happened to just scribbling formulas on the palm of your hand? The YouTube clip is interesting and so is the discussion that follows. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3160/students-show-how-to-cheat-via-youtube?utm_source=at&amp;amp;utm_medium=en"&gt;http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3160/students-show-how-to-cheat-via-youtube?utm_source=at&amp;amp;utm_medium=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29850" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/engineering+education/default.aspx">engineering education</category></item><item><title>You, too, can move Stonehenge-sized pillars - </title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/11/you-too-can-move-stonehenge-sized-pillars.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29839</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29839.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29839</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;When researchers were devising their complicated theories about how ancient Britons built Stonehenge, apparently they forgot to consult today's construction workers. It turns out erecting Stonehenge's pillars may not have involved nearly as much effort or as many people as researchers have supposed. That's the take-away from this video of a Michigan construction worker who, by himself, moves around multi-ton concrete pillars and is erecting his own version of Stonehenge to prove his point that the whole thing was well within the capabilities of a few ancients.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://j-walkblog.com/index.php?/weblog/posts/moving_big_rocks"&gt;http://j-walkblog.com/index.php?/weblog/posts/moving_big_rocks&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29839" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/construction+engineering/default.aspx">construction engineering</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/stonehenge/default.aspx">stonehenge</category></item><item><title>Don't let this happen to you: Toyota engineer works self to death</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/10/don-t-let-this-happen-to-you-toyota-engineers-works-self-to-death.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29836</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29836.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29836</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;This is all over the Web but here is a link to the story if you haven't seen it. The chief engineer for the Camry hybrid died of a heart attack which was eventually ruled to be caused by overwork, poor guy. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For those unfamiliar with the Toyota method of product development, the chief engineer on the project is responsible for the ultimate success or failure of the effort and is under a lot of pressure. The moral of the story: stress can kill.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080709/ap_on_bi_ge/japan_overwork_death"&gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080709/ap_on_bi_ge/japan_overwork_death&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29836" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/automotive+technology/default.aspx">automotive technology</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/toyota/default.aspx">toyota</category></item><item><title>interesting use of hydraulics - trabant changes into an el camino</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/09/interesting-use-of-hydraulics-trabant-changes-into-an-el-camino.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29830</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29830.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29830</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Done as an artistic piece, this "trabantimino" extends itself via hydraulics to change from an east german trabant to an american muscle car. Of course, it carries a V8 engine -- no amount of transformer action can change&amp;nbsp; a 26-hp trabant engine into a small block chevy. Unfortunately, the video doesn't really show all that much of the underlying technology.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://mywikibiz.com/Liz_Cohen"&gt;http://mywikibiz.com/Liz_Cohen&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29830" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/hydraulics+muscle+car/default.aspx">hydraulics muscle car</category></item><item><title>when an F-16 flies within 10 ft of private prop plane</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/09/when-an-f-16-flies-within-10-ft-of-private-prop-plane.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29829</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29829.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29829</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;The link below takes you to an audio/video clip showing the ATC radar screen readout and the radio exchange that happened when a private pilot minding his own business got buzzed by an F-16 pilot. The private pilot is obviously hopping mad. He claims the F-16 came within 10 feet of him and did so on purpose. The clip, from AVwebBIZ, goes on to say the F-16 pilot got reprimanded for this little stunt.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/exclusivevids/ExclusiveVideo_F16InterceptsJetTurboprop_MOA_198263-1.html"&gt;http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/exclusivevids/ExclusiveVideo_F16InterceptsJetTurboprop_MOA_198263-1.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29829" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/aerospace/default.aspx">aerospace</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/flight/default.aspx">flight</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/pilots/default.aspx">pilots</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/F-16/default.aspx">F-16</category></item><item><title>Finally some sanity about high school GPAs</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/07/01/finally-some-sanity-about-high-school-gpas.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29805</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29805.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29805</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I always thought it was a little screwy that the grade I got in a high school typing class counted as much as my grade in precalculus. Looks like I wasn't the only one with this idea. Texas is apparently going to fold course difficulty into the calculation of high school GPAs. The move is quite controversial judging by the comments posted for this item in the Chronicle of Higher Education.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://chronicle.com/news/article/4766/recalculation-of-high-school-gpas-sows-confusion-in-texas?utm_source=at&amp;amp;utm_medium=en"&gt;http://chronicle.com/news/article/4766/recalculation-of-high-school-gpas-sows-confusion-in-texas?utm_source=at&amp;amp;utm_medium=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29805" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/engineering+education/default.aspx">engineering education</category></item></channel></rss>