<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.machinedesign.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>from the editor's desk : embedded system</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/embedded+system/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: embedded system</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.1)</generator><item><title>For fans of &quot;The Sarah Conner Chronicles&quot; -- How long should it take to reboot a Terminator?</title><link>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/2008/02/08/for-fans-of-the-sarah-conner-chronicles-how-long-should-it-take-to-reboot-a-terminator.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9fd04ceb-ea18-483e-aa22-d0b00268cf1e:29256</guid><dc:creator>Lee_Teschler</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/comments/29256.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/commentrss.aspx?PostID=29256</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I got a kick out of the old &lt;STRONG&gt;Arnold&lt;/STRONG&gt; Schwarzenegger 'Terminator' movies so I was looking forward to their reincarnation as a TV series called The Sarah Conner Chronicles. But I have to say one aspect of the fake technology invented by the screen writers stopped me a bit. It turns out that in the future it will take Terminator robots all of 15 seconds to reboot after the equivalent of blowing a circuit breaker. The writers have already used this bit of inventiveness several times for dramatic effect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd hazard a guess that engineers who are involved in bringing real systems back online after a hiccup are either laughing or throwing things at the TV when the mention of this "15 second reboot time" comes up. I can't think of too many embedded computer systems that have the luxury of 15 whole seconds in which to get back to normal after a traumatic event. Perhaps line reclosers in electrical substations take that&amp;nbsp; long, but that's by design: They keep retrying to see if temporary faults on the power line have gone away. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;The message is clear: In&amp;nbsp;the future, design for efficient reset will become a lost art.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://community.machinedesign.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=29256" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/Arnold+Schwarzenegger/default.aspx">Arnold Schwarzenegger</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/terminator/default.aspx">terminator</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/embedded+system/default.aspx">embedded system</category><category domain="http://community.machinedesign.com/blogs/editordesk/archive/tags/reboot/default.aspx">reboot</category></item></channel></rss>