Welcome to Machine Design Community Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Want to Compete Globally? Education isn’t Enough

Last post 04-03-2008, 11:13 AM by WC_Pezza. 1 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  03-17-2008, 11:25 AM 29429

    Want to Compete Globally? Education isn’t Enough

    You may not know Vivek Wadhwa, but you probably have heard about some of his research.
     
    As an Executive in Residence at Duke University, Wadhwa headed an effort to examine the number of engineering graduates in the U.S., China, and India. Prompting his work were alarming reports in the media that the latter two countries graduated 12 times as many engineers as the U.S. The implication was that we were in danger of losing our technological edge.

    Duke researchers found these foreign graduation rates were wildly inflated; the counts of engineers sometimes included mechanics and low-level technicians. The conclusion was the U.S. graduates about enough engineers.

    But we’ve still got big problems: No one really knows what kind of engineers the U.S. should produce to remain globally competitive. “We should determine which engineering skills will give us a long-term advantage and focus on producing more of those,” Wadhwa says.

    Indications are we just don’t do that. Wadhwa has a particular insight on globalism. He immigrated to the U.S. from India in 1980 and is keenly worried about an important source of U.S. competitive advantage: foreign students here to get a Ph.D.

    “In the 1990s, one-quarter of all new businesses in Silicon Valley were founded by immigrants. Today, that number has climbed to 50%. U.S.-wide, it is about 25%,” he says. A lot of these entrepreneurs have U.S.-earned Ph.D.s. Lest you think immigrant Ph.D.s steal employment from Americans, consider that the number of jobs created at these companies exceeds the number of immigrants allowed in over the years they were created.

    But now, more and more Ph.D.s head back to their own country instead of staying here. At GE India, for example, one-third of the R&D staff earned degrees in the U.S. At IBM India, half the Ph.D. researchers got their education here. This reverse brain-drain fuels a movement to out-source high value-add work elsewhere.

    And the trend isn’t because the grass has suddenly grown greener overseas. “Ph.D.s can’t get green cards,” shrugs Wadhwa. There are now over 1 million educated foreign nationals in the U.S. waiting to immigrate. Only about a 100,000 green cards are issued annually with a limit of 8,400 per country. “Most of these people will just return home out of frustration,” he says. The irony, of course, is that there are now 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. who didn’t bother to wait, and more coming every day.

    Nor are natural-born U.S. citizens likely to fill the Ph.D. gap. The reason has nothing to do with a lack of skills. “You have a high percentage of foreigners studying for advanced degrees partly because those degrees aren’t cost justified for Americans,” says Wadhwa. “The opportunity cost is so big that you never make back the money spent on tuition. Americans are smart and they have figured this out.”

    Clearly there is no pat answer to improving our position against global competitors. But here’s a good way to start: Get beyond the rhetoric of graduating more engineers. — Leland Teschler, Editor

  •  04-03-2008, 11:13 AM 29494 in reply to 29429

    Re: Want to Compete Globally? Education isn’t Enough

    Lee,

     

    Isn’t it ironic that while Asia is overstating the credentials of their “Engineers”, The U.S. is disregarding the importance of American Design Engineers?

     

    Design Engineering used to be considered the top of the Engineering pyramid in many of our leading corporations – now we are too often referred to by that loathsome term: “CAD Operators”

     

    I regrettably blame advances in CAD.  As recent as 10 years ago, I used to direct a group of about four or five designers and drafters as the Product Design Engineer.  But as solid modeling moved to the PC I happily found myself doing my own modeling.

     

    Unfortunately, these software advanced capabilities made the job look easy and I have found that managers have developed the mistaken idea that product design is a lower value skill than say, project planning or other non-design activities.

     

    Although, I love Design Engineering, I have considered moving back into full-time Project Engineering ( a lower skill in my opinion) in order to regain my old reputation.

     

    Of course, it doesn’t help that the Chinese and Indians have a bunch of low cost D&D guys posing as high level Design Engineers.
View as RSS news feed in XML